Spread the love

The recent explosive growth of the Internet and technology has brought many benefits, such as e-commerce, collaborative computing, online marketing, new ways of sharing and disseminating information. However, each side has its counterpart, and as the technology advances, hackers (certified ethical hacker courses) attack. With this dark side and many related security holes, businesses, governments and residents are worried about hackers entering their servers or networks, stealing valuable data, collecting passwords and intercepting financial information and map credits.

Many times, this can become a reality. Recently, there have been security vulnerabilities in larger banking financial institutions, which reported a wave of their website sending credit card information and debiting 15 700 customer security vulnerabilities. Another recent hacker case is a 16-year-old boy who admits hackers into the military and NASA computer networks. Its activities have led to the closure of NASA’s system and security vulnerabilities for three weeks, guarding against conventional weapons, biological, chemical and nuclear weapons attacks on military computer networks. This is just a small sample of real hackers. Most industry observers believe that there are only a handful of reports of security breaches.

To prevent hackers from becoming modern, most businesses and government agencies want to find security vulnerabilities in networks and systems with two options: hiring a team of experts to analyze and test their systems and discover their vulnerabilities. Expect malicious hackers to take advantage of them. Unfortunately, it is often the last time. Performing a security analysis or penetration test by a security consultant will result in an assessment of the report or security status, detailing all discovered vulnerabilities, and taking steps to address them and minimize the risk of attacks.

Ethical hackers or security consultants often have good programming skills and work in the computer network and computer and networking industries for many years. Their knowledge and experience are based on a detailed knowledge of the hardware and software required for actual vulnerability testing, project management skills and methods, when it is reported after testing. In addition, seminars, training courses and ethical hacking certifications are provided to IT professionals to expand their horizons and skills in these areas. But many times, these courses and seminar piracy only provide a very limited view of outdated hackers or simple hacking (certified ethical hacker courses) techniques. Its main purpose is to educate professionals, but not to create a new generation of hackers. The goal is to fill security holes instead of exploiting them.

A flaw, hacker or security consultant has more than a hack is a real experience and knowledge. There are signs that you can’t teach at a seminar or learn a lot from a book. The most obvious benefit is the pirate hacking experience before the real world. Since each network system is based on several defenses and network configurations, the hacker’s approach is unique, only with the rich experience of real hackers, someone can effectively switch from one technology to another based on the current situation. .

Another positive aspect of recruiting reform hackers as security consultants is to track the latest security attacks, and vulnerabilities and countermeasures are part of their job. A good hacker has far more security knowledge than most other IT professionals. Following the latest attacks and countermeasures is a full-time job, and even if an IT professional has an acceptable level of security knowledge, he or she must pay attention to the day-to-day responsibilities of network operations. To compensate for these “gap”, many hackers and security consultants use automated and commercial penetration and vulnerability software to provide the necessary security reports, but their capabilities are limited. A huge difference can be seen by comparing the results of automated crawling and hacking assessments or penetration testing.


But before the company decides to hire a reformed hacker, it is necessary to assess the negative aspects. There are certainly several types of hackers. One of them is the “grey hat”: those who don’t pay, they find mistakes to improve everyone’s safety. These are the best hackers because their enthusiasm for grooming has boosted their excellence and has not violated the law. Black pirate hackers, criminals, violate the law and believe that it is reasonable to do so. They are hackers who want to improve the reputation of the hacker community, while others want to prove that the security of their goals is fragile at all costs. Black helmets not only cause serious damage to their behavior, but also raise concerns about cybercriminals and the weaknesses they can exploit. The most recent and worst type of hacker is cybercriminals who have committed the most serious crimes. They use existing tools and techniques to steal personal, government or commercial confidential information, especially financial data. Cybercriminals are usually foreign governments, organized crime or work independently.

The biggest drawback in the decision making process is trust. What hacks do you commit, how much can you believe them? The main premise of security is to decide who to trust and then to lock everyone. By hiring hackers as security consultants, due to cybersecurity issues, the paradox is that trust lies in criminals. Not only do trust factors play a major role in the decision-making process, but decisions can have an impact on customers and shareholders. How do customers react if they know that they have hired a former criminal to test the security of a system or database that contains all personal and financial information? People with ethical and suspicious judgment are not the ones who should use confidential data to control the corporate network. In most cases, hackers, and those who make them hackers, don’t appreciate or follow standard business processes and structures. A disgruntled hacker with a deep understanding of the company’s network may create a nightmare scenario.